Because the market is bigger than Pixels and they could license much of it (I’d like to see more of it as open source, but it’s easier for a corporation to justify licensing the cutting edge stuff). I think a lot of OEMs would like access to Night Sight
Comment on Google layoffs: Sundar Pichai-led company fires entire Python team for ‘cheaper labour’
ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 6 months agoWhy would it be in googles interest to provide better cameras to OEMs? Google has to love that people buy pixel phones because other vendors cameras are years behind
Natanael@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Of course a lot of OEMs would like it, but google is incentivised to keep the best part of Android as pixel exclusives.
nasduia@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Regardless of the actual software processing details, in the wider population of Android consumers I’m pretty sure it’s Samsung that has the reputation for photography.
Samsung’s advertising focus is on advertising things that people understand and think they want, not AI assistants and cleaner versions of Android. Most of the reviews of the Pixel 8 criticise no telephoto lens while Samsung tends to have an excess being shown off.
Like everything Google does, I’m not sure it is any good at understanding people as humans rather than people as aggregate statistical models and that shows in its consumer devices.
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Samsung’s 10x camera is amazing, I’m pretty miffed they dropped down to a digial zoom 10x though, even if it gives other benefits like higher quality mid zooms between the 3x and 10x.
I really hope they bring it back or someone else has a good 10x lens by the time I need a new phone.
Fuck only having a 3x
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Pixels are a minuscule fraction of Android devices. Google would get more money by improving Android than by trying to increase their own marketshare.
danielfgom@lemmy.world 6 months ago
This