Comment on please defederate from exploding-heads.com and rammy.site
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year agoYou said it better than I was going to. Keeping truthaboutjews.ru out of grandma’s feed is one thing, but I feel like I’m savvy enough to read garbage responsibly. Maybe I’m being overconfident but there it is.
PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Do you have the same level of confidence in children and people who are deeply mentally ill?
If you want to read far-right trash, you can set up an account on a far-right trash server, rather than insisting that everybody else on the instance tolerates them for your convenience.
Their posts might be a harmless novelty for you but for others, they’re threats of violence and celebrations of abuse.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
I’m not SDF, or even that familiar with the organisation, but I would argue we shouldn’t let such people use this instance. Or grandma from my example, for that matter.
I never said they’re a harmless novelty to me. I don’t particularly expect to interact with these people but if I do I promise it won’t be in support of their hate, or even passive of it.
Like people have said, you can block things for yourself.
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
It sounds like you think it’s easy to police who can join an instance. The privacy ramifications of what you’re alluding to are troubling.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Sort of, but if you leave the door wide open you get, like, straight-up spambots, and then everyone defederates you. It’s pretty hard to make an email address without your real-life identity or something equivalent for the same reason.
PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 year ago
“Let’s just give them free reign and leave the people they’re trying to bully into suicide block them” sounds pretty passive to me.
Something people have been able to do on every platform the far-right have built a little rat nest on.
Looking at the last 5 years, do you feel that strategy has been effective?
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Well, you’re being true to you name, but I guess I’d question if your approach has been effective. We could make a walled garden, but that’s just [insert big platform] again and we all know where that goes.
“But hate is different!” well yeah it is, but walled garden is bad and semi-walled garden has proved unstable. By federating we’ve accepted that people will use the fediverse for whatever; defederating from something as a moderation tool effects only people on this small instance, which is useless. If it was a bigger instance maybe you would be right.
Of course, I’m basically a guest here, so I have to temper my opinions even on that, and you’re not even on this instance. It seems like there’s some free speech absolutists here so maybe I’m wasting my breath.
ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
You aren’t even a user of SDF Lemmy. So why are you spamming everyone here with your irrelevant opinions?
nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
I’m not sure that this approach is in-line with the org’s stated mission.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Oh, okay.
ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
This instance, which you are not a member of, is for adults who can decide what they want to read for themselves.
Maybe you should stick to discussing issues about the instance you’re actually on, instead of wasting people’s time in discussions which don’t involve you.
PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Don’t worry, you’re the smartest adult in the room so if my comments are upsetting you (in a way racist extremism doesn’t), just don’t read them.
It’s fascinating that this solution of yours is apparently only for other people reading far-right extremism.