Comment on U.S. "Know Your Customer" Proposal Will Put an End to Anonymous Cloud Users

CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• simplejack@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I was thinking of using this comment to train my for-profit LLM, but now that I see the licensing agreement, I know I will never be able weather the prolonged court battles.

  source

  • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Honestly at this point it’s more about just reading the replies from people who get bent out of shape about seeing that link, than actually protecting myself from bots. It’s almost like a strange internet Rorschach test.

    source

    • urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      For what it’s worth, I’m entertained by people needing to tell you what they think of your copy paste. It’s fun.

      Bring back forum signatures!

      —————

      Tryin to make a change :-\

      source

      • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Tryin to make a change :-\

        Be the change you want.

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        source
  • msage@programming.dev ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Damn, I was looking forward to the Jesus API

    source
• asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This is basically nationally enforced “security through obscurity” which is dumb as fuck.

  source

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    This is more of a privacy failure than a security failure. I don’t see how purchasing services via an alias could be considered security

    source

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      “attack US critical infrastructure” is security

      source

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “Security by obscurity” is very much an end user “i don’t need to harden my server/accounts because nobody would bother hacking me” attitude and is really is “dumb as fuck”

        But KYC is just expanded due diligence before providing services, thats why I thought it as privacy issue as to why someone would be against it as opposed to it security wise.

        I still don’t see how you’ve gotten from that to “nationally enforced security by obscurity” though

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• EdibleFriend@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  What is that link

  source

  • x4740N@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I assume that user is licencing their comments under creative commons

    source

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This is on par with the copypastas that floated around FB for a while isn’t it?

      source

      • db2@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        torrentfreak.com/copyright/

        source
    • spookex@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Now I want to see someone break down if that’s even enforceable

      source

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Especially given that this particular comment is 90% quotes from some other author.

        source
    • nevernevermore@kbin.social ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      No need to assume, you can see this on all of their comment history. They are claiming ownership of their words, or in the context, ownership of how they’ve arranged others words

      source

      • MakePorkGreatAgain@lemmy.basedcount.com ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        eh, I could just pirate their words if I so chose & there’d be fuckall they could do about it

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • MisterMoo@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Big sovereign citizen energy.

      source