What if we invent artificial gravity just so we can simulate pilot orientation and g forces while they sit still in a simulator?
Comment on First known test dogfight between AI and human pilot carried out, US military says
Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 months agoFor sure without humans the AI probably wins, assuming the instruments are good. This wasn’t without humans, but it probably still wins.
I’m fairly certain most dogfights happen on instruments only at this point, so I don’t see a chance the human won. The AI can react faster and more aggressively. It can also almost perfectly match a G-load profile limit (which could be much higher without humans on board) where a human needs to stay a little under to not do damage.
This is all assuming the data it was given was good and comprehensive, which I’m sure it was. It also likely trained in a simulation a lot too. This is one of those things AI is great for. Anything that requires doing something new and unique it can’t handle, but if it just requires executing an output based on inputs, that’s a perfect use case.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 months ago
echodot@feddit.uk 8 months ago
What aboutism taken to its extreme there.
Hell, what if we invented warp drive that allowed us to teleport bombs directly into our enemies headquarters?
magnusrufus@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Nonsense hypotheticals are not whataboutism.
echodot@feddit.uk 8 months ago
I don’t know, one camera lead falls out and it’s all over for the AI. The human still is going to be more adaptable than an AI and always will be until we have full true AGI.
Having said that if we ever do have AGI I 100% believe the US military would be stupid enough to put it in a combat aircraft.