Comment on First known test dogfight between AI and human pilot carried out, US military says
Gigan@lemmy.world 5 months agoJets are far more powerful than humans are capable of controlling. Flight suits and training can only do so much to keep the pilot from blacking out.
Can they be piloted remotely? Or would that be too dangerous with latency
Latency, signal interference, and limited human intelligence are all limiting factors in that strategy.
If the enemy interferes with any of those, the enemy wins.
This was is already being fought with autonomous drones. By the end of it, the robots will be unrecognizable to us now.
You're better off with drones
What’s the difference? A remotely or AI-piloted fogger jet is just a big drone.
Drones are designed without cockpits. Retrofitting remote-control into an F-16 does not seem like the best choice to me.
Retrofitting F-16s to become drones (whether rc or ai-controlled) as well as designing a variant ditching human support for weight and monetary gains is the rational choice as long as non stealth aircraft are viable. In that case you’d stick to F-35s.
It makes no sense to waste billions worth of perfectly capable and proven airframes, engines and avionics. Any future drone that will have at least the same level of capabilities as an f-16 will cost practically cost the same. At the cost of high performance aircraft life support does not add that much cost to a plane, pilot costs (and availability) are a much bigger issue.
The only thing that makes it bigger is the cockpit. There’s no difference.
But can a drone fly like an F-16?
If an f16 is remote controlled, it’s technically a drone.
psud@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Yes they can. Before AI the US was expecting to move to remote piloted jets
intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Expecting to? We’ve been using remote piloted jets for twenty years.
psud@lemmy.world 5 months ago
That’s not the case yet for fighters, just things like predator drones and global hawk