That’s a good point 🥲
Comment on Which git plateform to choose?
talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If it’s for recruiters, put it on github. That’s the one they are most probably familiar with and you want to minimize barriers to access.
Gulliver@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Redjard@reddthat.com 1 month ago Also seo, I’ve sadly seen 4 year abandoned random forks rank as the first result and the actual project way below, just because it was on a self-hosted git. iirc that was the freedesktop one, so definitely not small, new, or low volume either.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Github is microslop, a company who supports a fascist regime. So no, worst choice.
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If a corporate recruiter or technical recruiter can’t navigate a git forge that is not GitHub that is their failing not your problem to fix.
HelloRoot@lemy.lol 1 month ago
yeah but they won’t fix it. They’ll make a note that this candidate is difficult to work with and look for another.
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Then you know the kind of environment the company fosters and do you want to work for an org that doesn’t have the decency to look at their applicants?
HelloRoot@lemy.lol 1 month ago
I don’t work for an org, I work for money.
Why should I self-sabotage my options, they might have a shit process and still pay well.
unitedwithme@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Amen brother idk why you’re down voted!! Good to know it’s a shit company right away.
otter@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
That only works for people who are higher up in their field of work, since they can pick and choose who they work for
Most people going for junior/entry level roles don’t have that luxury
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They don’t even have to “look”. Just grab the next resume off the stack.
Ghoelian@piefed.social 1 month ago
I mean that really depends on how badly you want the job.