Comment on Face masks made ‘little to no difference’ in preventing spread of COVID: study
Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 months agoand your stupidity contributed to countless deaths
It’s pretty countable. 1,187,509 deaths at the time of this comment. You made valid points, but were all of the personal attacks necessary?
airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 months ago
I think our side would deny those deaths could possibly be attributed to covid (how would anyone check these stats?). Contrarily, many would point out the adverse effects from taking the “vax” as reported on VAERS
Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 months ago
You seem like you enjoy research, you should go look up how causes of death are determined, and how vaccine efficacy is calculated. We’ve had this stuff figured out for over a hundred years now. Going backwards is not only unnecessary, it’s foolish, and destructive.
airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 months ago
Have you done research on this? Sanitation was thought to do more to prevent disease than vaccines:
organiclifestylemagazine.com/how-plumbing-not-vac…
The questionable experimental “covid vax” fanned the flames of skepticism towards all vaccines
Prior to “covid”, it was reported the flu shot was the least effective in recent years
We could circle back to a lot of proven medical actions. A lot of deaths attributed to “covid” were with people who had additional issues like obesity, were smoking, or elderly, vitamin D deficient. So get people to lose weight and make sure they have vitamin D and quarantine the elderly. Many actionable items that were conveniently ignored, since they could make lots of money pushing a “vaccine” to swindle the population out of money. That is another thing, how the “vaccine” was paid for by tax dollars, rather than the people who wanted them. Problem after problem…
Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 months ago
If you knew for certain that you were going to die, but hopping on one foot would give you a 60% chance to live, would you do it? Now what if rubbing your belly gave you a 30% chance to live, and patting your head gave you 10% chance? But if you do all 3 you have a 100% chance to live. Would you only hop on one foot since that’s the most effective? No, you would do all 3, combining the methods for maximum effectiveness. Your argument is no different, except you’re saying in this non-hypothetical situation you’re only going to do one thing.