Comment

disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Despite having “sexual” as its root, sapiosexuality is an attraction-defining term, not to be confused with a definition of sexuality. Like other attraction-defining terms, it’s not exclusive.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I just hate labels. I like what I like. Not just smart people. Not just pretty people. Not even people with specific genitals.

source
- flicker@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Ah. Chaotic horny.
  
  Just like me.
  
  source
  - imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    now kiss
    
    source
- wewbull@feddit.uk ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  Not just smart people. Not just pretty people.
  
  …but also pretty smart people?
  
  source
Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Why does this comment start with “despite”? Aren’t all [something]sexualities “attraction-defining terms”?

source
- disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Traditionally speaking, the terms heterosexual and homosexual tend to be exclusive by omitting attraction to the opposite sex. I was clarifying that a sapiosexual is not exclusively attracted to intellectuals.
  
  *Now that sexuality is defined as a non-binary spectrum, some may disagree with my use of “opposite sex.” I admit I don’t know the correct way to convey the idea. I don’t mean to offend.
  
  source