Comment on Mona: Court rules women’s-only exhibit must allow male visitors
Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 months agoI don’t mind other people doing things that are stupid. I do mind other people doing things that are harmful. The difficult part is finding where that line is, if and how to legislate it and what the implications are on other important societal values.
In this example of a cafe refusing to serve people based in race, I’m personally totally fine with that being illegal.
quindraco@lemm.ee 7 months ago
How do you ban such a cafe while also banning slavery? How do you draw a line between permissible and impermissible compulsory labor when you’re drafting your Constitution to reign in future politicians?
Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
It is not permitted to own another human being.
It is not permitted to discriminate against a human being based on a protected class such as race.
Is there some contradiction there that I’m not seeing?
ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
I think the reasoning is that since having a job is essential for almost everyone, then by making it illegal to have a job in which one may refuse to deal with members of a protected class, the government is effectively compelling everyone to deal with them, which might be seen as a form of forced labor.
zaph@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
That’d be a massive stretch. Getting paid to do a job you don’t like isn’t slavery.
wahming@monyet.cc 7 months ago
I’m not seeing a problem with ‘treat people as people regardless of their skin colour’.