Disagree. It is the governments job to protect themselves and their citizens. The problem is the government only wants that responsibility when it suits them. When Google is collecting your data it’s fine. When Facebook is collecting your data and leaking it, and poisoning you with unsolicited propaganda, that’s fine. But when tik tok does it it’s not fine because tik tok is controlled by the CCP and they’re a foreign power who are trying to sabotage the US. This bill is a BS money grab being pushed by politicians who’s pockets are being lined by big American Tech companies. It has nothing to do with consumer protection because if it did, Facebook and Google and Twitter and Amazon would all be in the same boat.
Comment on How the House revived the TikTok ban bill before most of us noticed
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 6 months ago
I’ve never used TikTok and probably never will, but I still don’t think it’s the government’s job to decide what apps I’m allowed to use and what not. Educate people about the dangers of social media and if that doesn’t work then it’s out of your hands.
atrielienz@lemmy.world 6 months ago
K1nsey6@lemmy.world 6 months ago
American Tech companies
And AIPAC.
K1nsey6@lemmy.world 6 months ago
The only danger coming from TikTok is governments can no longer control the narrative, we are seeing through many government lies and hurting corporate profits. It’s helping break down the divisions that keep us separated and them in power.
Nilz@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
Do you also think the same about alcohol, tobacco, drugs and gambling?
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Yes. See my other reply.
richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 6 months ago
Literally freedumb.
angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 6 months ago
Adults are literally allowed to use 3/4 of those in the United States and most of the rest of the world.
Nilz@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
You seem to be missing the point.
in fact the US is stricter on drugs and alcohol than a lot of it’s peer nations
This is exactly why I posted my comment: Those things are regulated sincr they have age restrictions/bans/taxes(tarrifs?). TikTok doesn’t have any of those. Plus it’s not like you can tax TikTok use like you can tax alcohol use so I don’t understand your comparison with Smirnoff.
madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 6 months ago
We will eventually scientifically determine the neurological impact of social media is both damaging long term and requires health treatment.
This isn’t about the content itself, it’s the addictive nature of how it’s delivered and the ability to rapidly manipulate people.
thejml@lemm.ee 6 months ago
And this isn’t even about social media. This bill is to prevent the external data collection and manipulation of a group of people by an external to the US organization. If this was about with of those in general, then I’d be all about it. We need better data protections here in the US and we need social media platforms to be held accountable on that charge, but this isn’t that bill. This doesn’t affect Meta, or X or any other domestic site which are just as bad at both manipulation and data gathering/selling.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 6 months ago
I totally agree that it’s bad for us but so are a thousand other things aswell. I wouldn’t want the government mandating what I can eat and drink, how much I have to sleep and exercise, what substances I’m allowed to smoke, which risky activities I’m allowed to partake etc. I should be allowed to live an unhealthy lifestyle if I so decide.
If we’re going to ban TikTok based on the negative health effects then it seems a bit hypocritical to me that we’re ignoring things like sugar, tobacco and alcohol or if we’re strictly speaking of media content then porn should be the first thing to go. I don’t understand how one can be for banning one but not the another.
atrielienz@lemmy.world 6 months ago
But the government literally already does that. There’s a whole food and drug administration. Weed isn’t completely de-scheduled yet despite the number of states that have legalized it. You literally can’t go to a shooting range without following the rules of the range, or go skydiving without signing a waiver, you can’t buy alcohol until you’re 21, and in some states can’t even buy cigarettes until then either. Want to rent a car? Can’t at 19. The government interferes in cases of public safety all the time.
That being said they aren’t attempting to ban tik tok because of the effects on the public’s mental health. That’s BS. They are trying to force the sale of tik tok to a US friendly tech company because they don’t like how much power the CCP has over it. The purpose isn’t to protect privacy or mental health. It’s to only allow companies friendly to the US to affect the mental health of its residents and collect their private data.