Humans aren’t perfectly rational consumers, capable of always depriving themselves of joy in the name of fiscal responsibility.
I imagine the crux of your argument rests on the idea that eating out for $70 or $90 are two identical things, when in fact they are not. If you do it 10 times a year, it’s a $200 difference.
The reason that difference exists is to satisfy the desire the owning class has to not pay workers enough to survive. If they did, the capitalists would have less money, you would have more money, and the waiter would have the same amount of money.
That’s better. Not perfectly ideal, but better than now.
RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I didn’t know eating was a luxury sorry
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 9 months ago
It’s not, but eating at a restaurant is.
RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Not really. Not unless it’s a fancy restaurant. Sometimes you just need to eat when you aren’t home.
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 9 months ago
It’s called “bringing food” or “going home.”