Having tested OnShape years ago, where it already appeared very feature rich and smooth, I have no doupt one can for sure realize complex multi-part assemblies with it. For me the interesting part, in a professional environment, would be the software’s capabilities of its drawing module. Full digital workflows seem to gain track, but for me detailed technical drawings are still the bread and butter application of a CAD.
Comment on Windows 11 24H2 goes from “unsupported” to “unbootable” on some older PCs
MeanEYE@lemmy.world 11 months agoHeh, no problems here using a CAD software it’s just that am always hunting for options. Currently am set on SolveSpace and OpenSCAD for simpler models. SolveSpace is good enough for pretty much all of my needs. It’s a bit more of manual work instead of clicking an option, chamfers being one example, but I come from machine engineering high school so that way of work suits me just well as we use to draw everything by hand, so I am no stranger to planning ahead anyway.
So far I have avoided cloud solutions but I guess that has evolved a lot by now. How do they fair with more complex shapes with more restrictions?
feinstruktur@lemmy.ml 11 months ago
bluewing@lemm.ee 11 months ago
OnShape will restrict the number of active drawings you can work on at a time. It’s a simple matter of turning them on and off. Worst part of OnShape is all your work is public, (they are very up front about this), and can’t be hidden. But, you can make a single model as complex as you wish. It’s always the latest and greatest version of OnShape every time you log in. And it simply works on any platform that can open a web browser. There is even an app for your phone. I don’t really use it at home because I live in a very rural area and electricity can be kind of sketchy at times, let alone the internet. So it can be unreliable for me.
Fusion360 is quite popular due to the perceived ease of use. To be fair there are a ton of very good tutorials for it and the documentation is top notch. Having used a few different CAD packages over 30 years, I’m not overly impressed by it - it’s not better or worse than any other choice when you start really working it. I don’t care for how much of the “good stuff” they have locked away unless you pay to play. But most hobby users won’t notice that issue. They just want an .stl to 3D print - which Fusion is pretty slow to output. And because Fusion uses a half-arsed half local/half cloud solution, (Windows only need apply), and it updates on login it is slow to load, which I dislike. Plus if you do lose the internet, it severely cripples your work until you can log back in.
SolidEdge offers a free hobby version and it worked pretty well when I messed with it for a couple of months. It had a SolidWorks feel to it for me. It’s a local install and requires no internet to use. I thought the assembly was limited and not always super intuitive. But it’s been a few years since I tried it.
I just use FreeCAD now. I like the local install/run. And right now things are changing for the better with it. Lots of new features and more importantly improvements to the underlying code to make things more robust are coming in the development releases. And more and more excellent tutorials are being created and released. If you are willing to learn, FreeCAD offers a full 3D modeling experience.
Overall, you can design rocket ships to the stars with any of the online CAD solutions, well maybe not TinkerCAD. But, like any other free version of commercial software, they will impose limits on us freeloaders. Try one and see if you like them and it suits your needs.
MeanEYE@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Thanks. I’d love Fusion or SolidEdge, but they don’t support Linux. And am not keen on always-online solutions.
bluewing@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Neither am I - hence FreeCAD.
But a very large number of users simply don’t care about avoiding cloud solutions or using Linux. And OnShape does offer some unique solutions to low powered computing/agnostic OS uses and for the more corporate minded needs, the ability of two users to be able to work on the same model at the same time and see each other’s changes in real time. Which can lead to faster collaborations and iterations of a design. And as someone who has wasted weeks of my life emailing design changes back and forth, this would have been a very handy thing at times.