Comment on Nothing was off-limits for retro game ads

• p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Like Fabio? Pretty much any depiction of a barbarian is some muscular dude wearing only a loincloth and his broadsword.

  source

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Doubt that’s going to be enough, I think if you want to make a sexually objectifying 90s magazine ad that appeals to female nerds you’re going to have to break out the homoerotic innuendos

    source
  • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    People used to bring up Kratos in these discussions but before these new games he seemed far more likely to bite someone’s face off than to kiss anyone. There’s a difference.

    source
• molochthagod@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’d rather we stop sexualizing characters altogether. If anything, it’s silly and makes it more difficult to take them seriously.

  source

  • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I think there is space for both sexualized and non-sexualized characters, as long as they are treated evenly. This is entertainment, they don’t need to be all business serious.

    I dread that in trying to be perfectly respectable, the medium might err to the side of prudishness and sexual repression.

    source
• vox@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  🤤

  source
• pickman_model@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Fair

  source
• Daxtron2@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m ok with that

  source
• cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  looking in your direction, clive rosfield

  source
• BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  After a woman says she doesn’t like being sexualized, your response is to not worry because the sexualization of women will continue, but you’ll start to sexualize men, too?

  source