Comment on A crowd destroyed a driverless Waymo car in San Francisco
circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 months agoGreat, so anything that humans do that can potentially harm another human, should be given to the algorithms instead?
Sure, they’re private for-profit blackbox algorithms, but it’s obviously better then letting humans do things.
Don’t worry, I’m sure once the tech oligarchs have secured just another 25% control over our daily lives, they’ll start the giving back and bettering humanity parts of their business plans.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Uh yeah, once it’s proven safer why wouldn’t you?
Because you’re scared of the word algorithm?
You seem to have an issue with wealth distribution, not autonomous vehicles.
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 months ago
How much could an autonomous car cost Michael, $10?
masterspace@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
We’re talking about a taxi service, not an individual’s car. Waymo is not example of wealth inequality, unless the brush you use is as broad as "requires technology to run = tech bro devilry’.
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 months ago
Happen to know the cost of one Waymo taxi vs one taxi plus a person making a living from driving that taxi? I do know that Waymo charges more and almost all info is hidden.