I mean if the only way they’re gonna have jobs is through predatory hiring practices that could leave them fired and without severance, then yeah. Because if the company is planning on hiring these younger workers for the long-haul, then this shouldn’t be a significant change. I think overall national policy should discourage unnecessary high-turnover and predatory hiring. I’m sure there will be situations this is still unavoidable, but that doesn’t mean we have to endorse it by way of law/policy.
Comment on Tech Employee Who Went Viral for Filming Her Firing Has No Regrets
deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 year agoI guess you’re OK with putting a damper on entry level positions if it protects workers who already have a job.
godzillabacter@lemmy.world 1 year ago
stardust@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Yeah, what companies want is all jobs to be exploitable like entry level jobs. That’s kind of what’s happening now with stuff like Uber where companies get away with paying their employees as little as possible and few benefits.
Protecting and providing incentive to hire for the long term seems like better thing in the long run over many crappy low paying jobs.
jak@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
They gave a nuanced reply. You wrote that.