Comment on What's the point of American police saying "Show your hands" after they shot a man?

• AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Yep:

  Nine bystanders were wounded by stray bullets fired by the officers and ricocheting debris, but none suffered life-threatening injuries.

  en.wikipedia.org/…/2012_Empire_State_Building_sho…

  source
• blahsay@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You say that but most cops still will go their whole career without firing their gun statistically.

  Plus hand guns are crazy hard to aim over any distance

  source

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You say that but most cops still will go their whole career without firing their gun statistically.

    you know the other part of that statistic, right? that those who do tend to get into substantially more situations that ‘require’ lethal force in the first place. Some of this has to do with where they happen to work… cops working in departments within large cities are much more likely than cops out in the burbs or sticks. Part of it is also their specific occupational specialty- SWAT for example is just put into more situations where it’s necessary, compared to state highway patrol vehicle inspectors. or the Federal Reserve Cops.

    Plus hand guns are crazy hard to aim over any distance

    Yeah, that’s true enough when your average cop has less than 15 hours of range time annually, and only quals out once a year. The vast majority of distance for police engagement is 3-6 feet.

    Cops need to be better- every round that misses it’s target is potentially some random kid caught in the crossfire. Personally, cops need way more training on not going to lethal force in the first place. but that’s a different topic.

    source

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Police in Finland regularly stop suspects by shooting them into leg which according to many Americans is impossible due to how inaccurate pistols are. That apparently means the alternative is then to dump the entire mag into the torso.

      source

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Got a proper source on that claim there? Cuz… yeah.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        How regularly?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      cops need way more training on not going to lethal force in the first place. but that’s a different topic.

      Yeah, that tends to be my response as well. I usually try not to second guess a stressful situation where I wasn’t there, but all too often it really seems like lethal force is the goto response in way too many cases.

      The example above where a female cop killed a junkie approaching her …. The post was intended to demonstrate multiple shots may be necessary, but what I saw was that after telling the guy to stop, the cops only option was lethal force. I’d really like to see some of these anecdotes show cops trying other options, even if it eventually escalated to lethal force

      source

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        So, like, there’s a lot to be learned from UK cops in how they handle knife-armed subjects. In general, you tend to fight how you train; so when you spend a lot of the focus of your training on lethal force, that usually becomes where your focus is.

        For example that lady that shot a guy, shouting ‘TAZER TAZER TAZER’, even though she drew her firearm. What I assume she meant to go for tazer, but in the stress of the moment, muscle memory took over and she spent hours practicing her pistol draw and not much at all practicing the taser draw. (she could have meant to do it, too, shouting tazer for the body camera, but while recognizing that… i wasn’t there and I don’t know her.)

        Increasing training on less-lethal or non-lethal methods; and actually training soft skills in the same way as firearms is how you solve that. The other thing, personally, that we really need to ramp up recruitment for police. This gets you a lot of things. Enough bodies means you can now spend a few hours a week training something rather than one or two classes a year, spread it out; physical training, yes, but soft skills like negotiation, deescalation and the basics of EDP-stuffs. the other reason is, then you can start firing all the fucking assholes. (which this is how you get institutional change. you change the institution by changing the poeple that make it up.)

        source
    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I hope you can move to somewhere safer.

      source
  • Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Not crazy hard. Just “needs some amount of regular training and practice” hard.

    source

    • blahsay@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Lol I’m an excellent shot with a rifle but with a pistol…guilty.

      source
  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Y’all either need better guns or better training, because I never had any trouble with it.

    source

    • blahsay@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Try hitting something past 25m with a pistol. Better chance throwing it or I do anyway.

      source
    • AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Certainly need better training.

      source
• Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Or think for shit

  source