Comment on Jesus leaving Chili's the way His father would want him to on Christmas night

• TigrisMorte@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  more like 8-10. Christ was born between 4-6 BC according to the Biblical Scholar's generally accepted date.

  source

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Didn’t exist at all according to reality, though.

    Even if he did, I’m not sure 10yos are such great partiers either 😄

    source

    • problembasedperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Is accepted among historians that the historial figure of Jesus existed.

      source

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Most of whom are religious people deferring to other religious historians who based their conclusions on a few vague accounts from romans and Jewish scholars that weren’t even born at the time.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        [deleted]

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Fell free to prove you claim at any point. As you can't, perhaps consider accepting that your beliefs, no matter how vital to your life, are not superior to anyone else's. But then you'll just demand you don't have to prove your factless claim and that I must prove Jesus did exist. Something I didn't claim but in fact informed whose claim it was. And yet your faith in your personal belief is so fragile, you had to jump in and refute a statement no one made.

      source

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Please stop replying to all of my comments with the same ridiculous misconceptions.

        source
    • Rakonat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Romans kept pretty good records of what they did in Palestine. There isn’t much doubt that a guy named Jesus in Palestine claiming to be the son of the Hebrew god was crucified at the time.

      source

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Romans kept pretty good records of what they did in Palestine

        They were also known to twist history to suit their narratives and as the primary Christian power, pretending that their fictional guy was real very much suited their narrative.

        To put it another way: since the Romans had a vested interest in the world believing he existed and there’s no contemporary records, the burden of proof has not been reached.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • abbadon420@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It is generally accepted that the historical person of Jesus did exist. There are other (non biblical) sources fromt that era that mention a man named Jesus of Nazareth from the Palestine area in the first century. Which is only logical, since he made quite a political and religious ruckus. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

      source

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I’ve been over this already with the other guy parroting the popular but unsubstantiated narrative of “historical Jesus”, so I’m just gonna link you there.

        lemmy.world/comment/6252063

        source