Comment on Using AI, researchers identify a new class of antibiotic candidates that can kill a drug-resistant bacterium

Tremble@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Daxtron2@startrek.website ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Personally I think all medicine should be public domain

  source

  • deft@ttrpg.network ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Everything should.

    Medicine. Internet. Waste disposal.

    source

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      So you want to reduce innovation and cause creators to not get properly paid for their work? Great idea

      source

      • themurphy@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        No, because paying for your medicin and Internet is something your government/country SHOULD do.

        Healthy people with access to the surrounding world through the Internet is a giant net positive for a country.

        But ofc we have to think of the poor billionaires first.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • deft@ttrpg.network ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        lol “innovation” what is this 1925?

        how innovative are the cars being produced because they look the same.

        half those medicines are publicly funded

        the Internet is publicly funded.

        this belief of private sector innovation is not as true as they sell it to be.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Yeah, so the actual law is that if you didn’t do any work and just gave ChatGPT or Midjourney a prompt and it shat out a picture and then brag to the copyright office in your application that you didn’t do diddly squat, the work effectively had no human authors. If, instead, you build a new machine learning model, tune it for your specific problem, analyze the results, and furthermore, break new ground understanding how it solved your problem, and then you write the paper, in fact, you have tons of ownership over the work.

  The fact people can’t tell the difference between the two and are actually upvoting you kind of says a lot about how little most people understand this stuff.

  source

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m just downvoting you for being a smarmy prick. Not because your comment is inaccurate.

    source

    • guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Would you also agree it’s rude to imply that this group of researchers, who actually advanced the state of the art in machine learning, are just a bunch of ChatGPT jockeys who don’t deserve credit for their work?

      source
    • barsoap@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I hope you’re at least consistent and downvoted yourself, then.

      source
    • dwalin@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Same :/

      source

      • pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        ^

        source
• roofuskit@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I think those rulings have only applied to creative works. We’ll see.

  source

  • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    This 100% is classified as a creative work. That's why drugs are able to be patented in the first place.

    source
• GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Depends, what was the training set / knowledge base?

  source