From the investors who are paying the cheques of course. They are corporations, they can afford to spend some coins on [checks notes] living wages.
Comment on Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing"
helenslunch@feddit.nl 11 months agoWhether I’m pirating or buying a TV show, the actors were already compensated for their time
And where do you think that money comes from…?
veniasilente@lemm.ee 11 months ago
helenslunch@feddit.nl 11 months ago
That’s exactly it. Investors. They are not donations. They expect a return on their investments.
veniasilente@lemm.ee 11 months ago
And such “return” comes after the work, not before. So there’s no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people. Now that would be air-quotes “stealing”!
helenslunch@feddit.nl 11 months ago
And such “return” comes after the work
And once again, where do you suppose it comes from?
So there’s no reason to condition the wages to do the work, on the potential that the work might be sold or not and to what amount of people.
How does one “condition wages”?
CybranM@feddit.nu 11 months ago
It just magically appears /s Its disingenuous to try and justify piracy on the basis that the performers have already been paid. I don’t agree with studios either of course, customers are being scammed