Here is some capitalism and oligarchy propagandist for you:
Comment on A perfect visualisation of a wasteful system
deafboy@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Guy can’t even take a nap without being abused by propagandists.
uis@lemmy.world 9 months ago
FaeDrifter@midwest.social 9 months ago
Yeah, we should own those dirty communist propagandists by housing every homeless person.
The commies will be sooo owned if we do that.
MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 9 months ago
yes please daddy antisocialist me harder
SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Social democrats*
It’s like communism but it works, and you don’t even have to kill minorities like you do on communism.
MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Wussss
I AM A COMMUNIST
masquenox@lemmy.world 9 months ago
TIL… Derek Chauvin is really a communist.
SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 9 months ago
He’s a fascist like a commie, but that’s where the similarities end
Cowbee@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Why does Communism necessitate killing minorities, and why are you assuming Social Democracies haven’t killed minorities?
Do you think tools have a mystical property that requires the owners to turn evil if they are collectively owned, rather than privately?
SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Good question, let’s hope you are able to have a civil conversation!
First of all, every communist regime has systemically killed off their minorities. Social democrat governments haven’t. I hope that clears it up. If you come across social democratic governments systematically killing minorities, let me know though.
Like I said earlier, the underlying economic model under the fascism is irrelevant to the millions of minorities having being killed by communist regimes.
fosforus@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
There are some capitalist countries that have a pretty low number of homeless people. Finland, for instance: 3,686 in 2022 (0,07% of whole population). So yeah, perhaps USA could do a lot better in this.
ahnesampo@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
Finland has a housing first policy. The homeless often have multiple problems that prevent them from getting a home the normal way (e.g. drug problems that cause them to get evicted). Instead of insisting people get better while homeless, they’re given homes first and treatment for their other problems after. This coupled with welfare transfers that ensure you never end up homeless just because of lack of money leads to low homeless numbers.
Cowbee@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Yes, Finland does this precisely by rejecting Capitalism and giving homeless people homes. This is not a Capitalistic solution.
I get what you’re saying, you can have a majority Capitalist society and still solve homelessness, but the answer will never be Capitalism.
dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
Finland’s version of capitalism is in another universe compared to North American capitalism. Finland had UBI, rehabilitation first prisons, housing is treated more as a human right. Socialism doesn’t mean the abolition of commerce, it just removes the predatory hoodwink from the equation.
fosforus@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
Yeah, quite a lot more capitalistic: www.heritage.org/index/ranking
We have never had UBI. Only some local experiments that have ended now. Other things you said are correct though.