Comment on He did though.

• Darkard@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  “Excuse me madam but do you have a license to use those tits? No? Didn’t think so. The content of those bazongas is Nestle property. I’m afraid I’m going to have to clamp those nipples until such time as the proper Bandonkadonk subscriptions are paid”

  source

  • shinratdr@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    i got this new legal drama plot. basically there’s this patent infringer except she’s got huge boobs. i mean some serious honkers. a real set of badonkers. packin some dobonhonkeros. massive dohoonkabhankoloos. big ol’ tonhongerekoogers.

    what happens next?!

    lawyer shows up with even bigger bonkhonagahoogs. humongous hungolomghononoloughongous

    source

    • TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I read this story in Barney Stinson’s voice.

      source
  • grue@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Have you considered a career in avian taxonomy?

    source

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Who doesn’t like the dickcissel or the tufted tit-mouse?

      source
  • zaphod@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    As long as the tits aren’t used for commercial purposes you don’t need a license. Anyway, I doubt that in Europe you could patent any naturally occuring molecules in any kind of milk.

    source

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You can patent pretty much anything in Europe.

      However, enforcing those patents is a completely different affair.

      source

      • zaphod@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Maybe some countries’ patent offices don’t take their job serious, but in general there are loads of things you can patent. For example basically anything naturally occuring is not generally patentable, but you can patent methods for synthesising or extracting naturally occuring things.

        source