They could, what can go wrong…
Comment on YouTube warns it might make your viewing experience worse if you don't turn off your ad-blocker
mvirts@lemmy.world 10 months ago
YouTube is just messing around. They could encode ads randomly on videos if they wanted to, like podcasts.
gian@lemmy.grys.it 10 months ago
FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 10 months ago
There’s already a sponsor blocker extension, it would be trivial to add other embedded ads to it.
n0xew@lemmy.world 10 months ago
They would just be able to create and stream 2 or more ad-encoded versions where ads are encoded in differently positions. Then no sponsorblock could save us since it would skip the wrong segments for some people…
lemann@lemmy.one 10 months ago
Those ads would need to be unskippable, otherwise we could just pull the timestamps that the Skip button uses and sponsorblock will be all complete again 👌
n0xew@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Fair point! I wasn’t thinking they would be skippable, but boy do I hope that I was wrong…
FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Ad blocking, uh, finds a way.
SPRUNT@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Image
space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Just build a database of ads. Then use some kind of image hash to compare against the displayed content.
pirat@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I like your way of thinking. This isn’t even limited to image. Comparing just a short snippet of the audio from a playing ad to a db could work very well too, thinking of how quickly Shazam etc. are able to identify a song if it’s in the db.
Snowpix@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
That’s not quite how it works. It’s crowdsourced, someone has to manually add every sponsored segment from a video into Sponsorblock. It can’t detect them on its own.
FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I never said it did?