You are talking about twitter, not X. The people who cared about removing that stuff were fired when Musk took over.
Comment on [deleted]
sir_reginald@lemmy.world 7 months ago
It’s certainly not impossible. But this content is actively removed when detected. So that person must have found something very recently posted before it could have been removed.
Twitter has a high interest in removing CSAM, even if they allow pro nazi talk. CSAM is illegal and they would have to shutdown if they didn’t immediately delete such content.
snooggums@kbin.social 7 months ago
NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 7 months ago
if they didn’t immediately delete such content.
Still there can be quite different interpretations of “immediately”, when you don’t have enough people working at it.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 months ago
Maybe. I doubt anyone is accusing Musk of specifically being okay with CSAM on his website.
The more likely accusation is that staffing problems at X—in the form of raw number of employees as well as employee morale and anything else contributing to how much work gets done—are so severe that more CSAM is getting through, and staying up, for longer than before.
Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Didn’t he unban and stick up for somebody who posted CSAM to the site? (I’ll try and find the article with it, if anybody else knows what it is feel free to reply with it).
seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 7 months ago
There’s something seriously wrong with our communication infrastructure if some rich nutjob can just buy it up and run it into the ground like this. This could’ve never happened if Twitter were a worker-owned collective. Chalk another one up for capitalism.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 months ago
Or if it were a federated platform made up of different instances with their own different business models and corporate structures.
But of course, federation and interoperability doesn’t work well with capitalist goals, so it’s still to blame either way.