Comment

Comment on White AI faces judged human more often than actual human faces

Kinda makes sense, right? The AI images are a representation of what an AI thinks a human “should” look like, so when another AI (likely trained on a similar dataset) tries to classify them, the AI images will more closely fit what it expects a human to look like.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
This is a classification made by humans, not by AI

source
- kakes@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Ahh, you’ll be unsurprised to hear I didn’t actually read the paper.
  
  That said, I still generally stand by my comment. While that makes this finding much more interesting, it does also make sense that the AI faces look like what our brains recognize as human.
  
  source
  - Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    It does sense indeed. But it also means AI has become very good in matching our expectations
    
    source
RecallMadness@lemmy.nz ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Exactly. The AIs job is to generate humanness. The things that don’t look human get discarded, the things that have strong human indicators get kept. Oh look, the AI did its job. Shocked pikachu.

The white thing is probably just a case of biased training data. Which is going to be a problem across all AIs. I wouldn’t be surprised if in 5-10 years (if the fad lasts longer than NFTs lmao) we find out the ‘AIs’ have all been fed biased data as yet another means of large corporations controlling the narrative of the population.

source