We don’t actually know what the robots were like before Mudd found them. They might have been even more debauched.
Comment on Harry Mudd does not represent the best of humanity
charonn0@startrek.website 1 year ago
Be honest, would you prefer an android slave that was programmed by a paragon of virtue, or one that was programmed by that unprincipled, evil-minded, lecherous kulak Harry Mudd?
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 1 year ago
Maybe this Mudd fellow is just misunderstood!
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 year ago
His glorious mustache is misunderstood. They wouldn’t let him have it on Discovery.
The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 1 year ago
The paragon of virtue of course!
But you should let me know where the lecherous ones are, just so I know where to avoid.
DroneRights@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Paragon of virtue. A paragon of virtue would necessarily be gay accepting and have a decent grasp of what’s good in gay sex, while Harry Mudd is a very heterosexual man and would be bad at programming a gay sexbot. Mudd’s sexbots would probably misgender me because they’re programmed for men.
IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 1 year ago
I’m a Linux user. I prefer compiling my own sexbot.
Moxvallix@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
my sexbot runs arch btw
IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 1 year ago
Game recognizes game my dude.
Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 1 year ago
Q: How do you know if a debaucherous chap compiled his own sexbot?
A: He'll tell you.