Comment on Google turns to regulators to make Apple open up iMessage

• Venetas@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Googles implementation of RCS, the one they are pushing as standard, is indeed proprietary

  source

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Eh? GSMA created RCS and Google simply setup their own servers to run it. So I guess you could argue that Google’s RCS network is proprietary, but RCS itself is most definitely not. There’s technical documentation freely available for implementing your own RCS client/server, if you care to do so.

    source

    • ilickfrogs@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Well didn’t they initially want carriers implementing RCS with interoperability between each other to sunset sms? But that didn’t quite pan out. IIRC there was a time when Verizon had a limited number of devices that supported RCS but only on their network, similar story with Bell in Canada. Hell at one point even Samsung had RCS but only with other Samsung phones. Fragmentation was rampant so Google took matters into their own hands. Not saying I’m happy Googles at the helm but they didn’t start out with that intention.

      source

      • AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Yeah it’s unfortunate we weren’t able to get RCS everywhere, as an improvement over sms. I imagine the encryption to be a sticking point preventing ubiquity

        source
  • Kbobabob@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You got a source for that?

    source

    • Drunemeton@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      en.m.wikipedia.org/…/Rich_Communication_Services

      So any RCS w/ Encryption that you see is referring to Google’s implementation that only runs on Google servers.

      source

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        So their implementation is RCS standards with an added encryption layer. What’s the issue?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• sarmale@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Image

  source