Comment on bro pls

• Gabu@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That’d be a valid comparison, if there were any evidence of a soul existing. The effects of matter, on the other hand, are clearly visible - or invisible, in the case of dark matter.

  source

  • HawlSera@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yes but at the same time we used to have all the evidence in the world indicate that planet Vulcan was just behind the sun, and then it turned out that no it wasn’t. If Dark Matter can’t be found no matter what experiment we do. Then maybe we are mistaken about its existence

    source
• agent_flounder@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  While we haven’t detected dark matter in a lab, it isn’t on the same level as a metaphysical soul.

  I’m not aware of any physical phenomena for which a soul is the best theory available.

  Whereas the gravitational effects^1 observed cannot be explained by general relativity and detectable matter are, so far, best explained by dark matter.

  ---

  1 includes: “formation and evolution of galaxies,[1] gravitational lensing,[2] observable universe’s current structure, mass position in galactic collisions,[3] motion of galaxies within galaxy clusters, and cosmic microwave background anisotropies.” - wikipedia

  source
• FastAndBulbous@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Just because something seemingly doesn’t interact with EM fields doesn’t mean it isn’t there, it’s just something that only really interacts with the rest of the universe on a gravitational level.

  source