Comment on [deleted]

• cricket98@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You also don’t understand the power draw of blockchain verification

  Sounds like you don’t understand. The blockchain that these monkey pictures are on do not use proof of work mining anymore, so there is no “wasting energy” anymore in the form of GPU/ASIC mining.

  source

  • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    So their contract addresses are down and they don’t do the one thing that set them apart from a usual token? Crazy. Sounds like it’s STILL worthless lmfao

    source

    • cricket98@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      What are you talking about? Did you respond to the wrong comment?

      source

      • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        You are now also on the list of “people who replied to a post about basic NFT function but did not know a basic NFT function”. You are a grifter, a helpful idiot, or actively being scammed.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• ByGourou@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  A supercar cost a lot to construct but I’m pretty sure it’s worse for the environnement than a single nft (and don’t tell me it’s useful, in most case it will stay rotting in a garage)… A Birkin bag can cost 100.000+ which is league out of it’s construction cost… Heck, a signed baseball cost 5 bucks to make and can sell for 600.000. . Not everything has more fake value and effect on the environnement, but you can find worse thing for each aspects. Not saying nft are good, nft are trash, but it’s not a special kind of trash.

  source

  • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s a gold brick scam, it’s a special enough type of trash to have a name dude

    source