Comment on YouTube's ‘War’ on Adblockers Shows How Google Controls the Internet

• DarkenLM@kbin.social ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I don't think even a decentralized service could hold a mass equal to youtube. That would require that either the owners of all instances pay from their own pockets with mostly no income to support it, or that every user paid up, which is not going to happen, at least not in a service like youtube.

  source

  • netburnr@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Some of us are data holders and have Gigabit internet with options to go even higher. Don’t count out the little guys ability to share massive amounts of data… been doing it since zip drives and CDs

    source

    • Traister101@lemmy.today ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Let’s say only 500gb of video are uploaded every hour in this hypothetical federated YouTube (actual volume for the site looks to be ~200tb an hour). Are you honestly going to argue that even that’s even just conceivably maintainable? You have to infinitely add storage space, multiple TBs a day.

      source

      • registrert@lemmy.sambands.net ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Let’s say I run my own hypothetical, federated, userpeer-to-peer and opt-in server CDN function-platform, also known as PeerTube…

        I’d only accept those video uploads/uploaders I consider quality content.

        I’d love to host many content creator’s videos. From the goodness of my heart, for free, as a gift to you all. But certainly not all videos, and nowhere near 200 TB/h. But I can afford to host many TB’s without it impacting my private economy.

        That video of some idiot eating tidepods or whatever the current thing is? They could find somebody else that will host. Or if unable, host their own videos. Now we’re both happy.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • kakes@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Have you seen the sheer amount of data hosted by YouTube though? There’s no way any amount of hobbyists are going to hold a candle to that.

      source
    • ubermeisters@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Except you don’t force licensing so you’ll get shit down immediately by some DMCA bullshit, by some asshole law firm.in another country probably.

      source
• wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That doesn’t address the issue of storage and compute power for streaming to the absurd amount of users.

  There’s been attempts before and it all comes down to file transfer time and storage (because at the time the servers weren’t transcoding for streaming the file. Secondary issue of buy in, like what we see with niche communities staying on reddit instead of moving to the fediverse.

  There already exist a number of projects out there like peertube. Take a look at how even the most popular instances are doing. It’s not well.

  ---

  The closest thing was around a decade ago, the popcorntime or popcornflix or whatever it was called app/program that was just a nice front end for torrenting videos and watching them before they finished downloading. Each individual user was responsible for their own storage, network connection speed, and compute power to render the video for themselves. Each end user was also contributing back through helping others to download the file via standard torrenting p2p stuff.

  So now you need a front end to host the magnet links to the files, and a robust set of seed servers so no video is ever truly lost. That still doesn’t cover a significant portion of youtube’s functionality like reccomendations, comments, allowing creators to edit/adjust videos after the fact.

  ---

  Unlike reddit, youtube is technologically complicated and impressive. Hell, read up on some of the stuff Netflix has had to do to achieve reasonable streaming quality and speed on an insanely smaller curated library.

  A decentralized federated solution is possible, but there’s a shit ton more that would have to go into this than just appealing to the concept.

  source

  • r3g3n3x@lemmy.one ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That still doesn’t cover a significant portion of youtube’s functionality like reccomendations, comments, allowing creators to edit/adjust videos after the fact.

    Seems to me that anything beyond the actual hosting and serving of the video file is unnecessary to include by default in a federated video streaming solution. To drill down a bit, recommendations don’t need to be handled by an algorithm, the content creator can make their own list of videos or playlist - do we really want another reco algo passively controlling what we feed our minds? Comments could be something as simple as a mastodon or lemmy thread with the video as the OP. Content editing after the fact doesn’t seem like its that big a deal aside from computational and bandwidth overhead which would seem small compared to the task of serving multiple thousands of viewers at once.

    source

    • Goronmon@kbin.social ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Seems to me that anything beyond the actual hosting and serving of the video file is unnecessary to include by default in a federated video streaming solution....

      You are basically saying "Other than the most expensive and complicated parts" the rest is easy or unnecessary. Which isn't necessarily accurate but still is being a bit dismissive of the problems at hand.

      And one of the biggest criticisms of Peertube (aside from the dearth of content, which helpfully avoids the "expensive/complicated" parts) has been Discoverability. How do people watch your videos (or your playlist) if they don't have a way of knowing that your videos even exist?

      source

      • r3g3n3x@lemmy.one ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I think we missed each other. My overall point is that aside from the hosting/serving, other federated networks/services could pick up the slack. The Federated Youtube doesn’t have to mirror Youtube exactly, or even mirror functionality all-inclusively (ie with reccos and comments etc. built-in), but could lean on other federated servers to provide similar functionality.

        As I said, comments could be a lemmy/mastodon thread. Recommendations or other discoverability could be other threads or maybe even a completely different service that hasn’t been created yet, I don’t know, but I do know that any reco algo needs to be open and subscribed to, not jammed down our throats and gamed. In the meantime, everyone’s got a search engine, right?

        Ultimately I don’t live in this social media/open source/development space too much, I just saw a way for these things to be built/used together to achieve an effect, distributing dev and process overhead and load across all the networks. I don’t have any insight on the bigger, more pertinent, file distribution problem.

        source
      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        At best word of mouth or users sharing it on lemmy (etc.).
        Good luck getting the niche stuff out of the bubble like it sometimes does with the algo.

        source
    • registrert@lemmy.sambands.net ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I agree with you so much a mere upvote won’t do.

      source
  • Species8472@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Would you mind sharing some ‘essential’ articles to read about this? I know the principle of how Netflix works, but always interested in learning more.

    source
  • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The closest thing was around a decade ago, the popcorntime

    That is still around, it’s just called stremio and you use a plugin called torrentio to get the torrents functionality that popcorntime offered.

    source
  • 4am@lemm.ee ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’d rather the storage and retrieval is just kind of built in to the network itself (p2p) and companies like Google can just do search on it.

    Make your money on ads, but keep it off my content if I don’t want to use your services. No need to vertically integrate so hard.

    source
• Turun@feddit.de ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It’s still just as expensive, you’re just adding administrative overhead.

  You’d also spread the cost to more people, true, but who would operate a server for free (based on donations, but if it’s federated why should I pay for that one server?). Also, do you trust all those people to keep operating the storage for years to come? Or are you done with losing access to videos, because someone lost interest in running their instance?

  Storage and bandwidth costs for video on demand are so incredibly high, I don’t think we’ll get a federated alternative to YouTube any time soon.

  source
• PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  grayjay.app

  source
• Vipsu@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Honestly this feels like the only possible way to win against Youtube. Goal could be to just create standardized decentralized platform where number of different companies/organizations can host and serve their own content while still being searchable and accessible from single client application.

  Major problem with Mastodon, Lemmy and Peertube is searching and browsing content from multiple instances is still difficult.

  source
• pascal@lemm.ee ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  peertube started with that idea. Unfortunately is poorly maintained, also because humans are inherently evil, it’s a nightmare to moderate.

  source
• Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I think it could work if most users contribute to the maintenance cost of their favorite instance. It’s just like mastodon and lemmy, but everything costs more.

  source