It be interesting to see if countries/people that won wars and brutally murdered everyone and caused complete demographic alteration has done better or worse long term.
I expect they have done better long term.
Comment on "But they could've posed a threat to the new system!"
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 21 hours ago
This is a dumbass post. If they didn’t kill the family of the Tsar they would be used by counter revolutionaries.
Wander@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 20 hours ago
Yeah, clearly it was the right choice since you just have to look at Reza Pahlavi trying to bring back the Persian monarchy today
Ariselas@piefed.ca 20 hours ago
yep, best not let the cancer fester. I guess that makes me a tankie
Windex007@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Can’t say if it makes you a tankie or not… but I can say that I wouldn’t be comfortable with you being within 200 feet of a middle school.
Edit: sorry, 100m. I just assumed you were from the USA because of how comfortable you are with the idea of school aged kids getting shot.
Ariselas@piefed.ca 10 hours ago
I’m pretty sure the bourgeoisie don’t send their kids to any school the prols can get within 100m of.
Schmoo@slrpnk.net 6 hours ago
Who cares? What difference does it make if counter revolutionaries try to restore the old royal family or make a new one? The problem with monarchy is the system itself, not whoever happens to occupy the position of monarch. Human beings are more than a symbol, no matter how powerful that symbol may be. There is no possible justification for the murder of children.