Windows telemetry CPU usage is almost nothing. This is mostly proton/dxvk doing it’s magic.
Comment on Linux vs Windows tested in 10 games - Linux 17% faster on Average
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Windows has so much garbage overhead via telemetry, etc. Glad to see someone quantifying how detrimental it is.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 year ago
taaz@biglemmowski.win 1 year ago
AVs on windows also do impact disk latency a lot.
TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Not to also mention the outdated filesytem
Gork@lemm.ee 1 year ago
We should rename NTFS to OTFS now.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
For real - it would be AWESOME if you could install windows on ZFS or btrfs or whatever
Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
They knew it’s not going to stay new forever, but they went ahead with that name anyway. I guess that’s what happens when the marketing team wins the company raffle.
barsoap@lemm.ee 1 year ago
NTFS isn’t the issue, at least in my experience, and not even Microsoft’s implementation of it (though ntfs-3g seems faster). The issue is the File Explorer: Things like reading mtimes of gigantic directories takes maybe a second under linux, nushell under windows (native, not WSL) is just a tiny bit slower, while File Explorer takes minutes to sort by mtime. Coming to think of it I should try Dolphin.