Comment on They use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.

woshang@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• t4k3@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • sir_reginald@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Definitely not wiremin! it’s scam

    source
  • Damaskox@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It seems that this decentralized style starts to be a new trend?

    First this Fediverse/Lemmy I heard about. Then The Matrix (messaging platform). And now these Mastodon & WreMin.

    Well, if that prevents or slows down the corrupted law of enshittification, then I’m approving it!

    source

    • Zink@programming.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      A fediverse decentralized Wikipedia substitute would be interesting for sure.

      Wikipedia’s massive head start is pretty strong though. With Lemmy, I don’t care if a post has 100 comments while the same article on Reddit has 10,000. The comments here are better anyway. But if a Fedipedia has 1/100 the subjects covered that Wikipedia does, that makes it less useful.

      source

      • Damaskox@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Yup…no matter how good a tool is, if there are no users to it, it might be as good as it never existed (unless if someone takes ideas from said tool and implements them to a user service, growing their quality, which is still better than nothing). Sad but true.

        source
    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      is wiremin using activitypub?

      source

      • Damaskox@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I don’t know myself. I just heard about it. Haven’t studied it at all.

        source