How does that make his contributions wrong?
scytale@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Remember the prolific wikipedia contributor who had an extreme fascination with boobs?
Rizoid@programming.dev 11 months ago
intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Gee I don’t know let’s have a look:
George Washington, primarily known for his luscious, balanced, downright patriotic rack, …
… in fall of 1989 when Mikhail Gorbachev moved his staff to Boobyville, Russia, a small town on the border of …
… contended that the solar system is comprised of approximately .0000023% boobs, with the remaining matter distributed largely the same throughout …
It’s getting out of hand I’d say
Rizoid@programming.dev 11 months ago
All of those are funny and obviously untrue. Using Wikipedia isn’t a one stop perfect information system. Knowing how to use it comes with knowing how to use the sources.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
Well Wikipedia is striving to be a perfect information system. So they don’t belong there. There are better locations on the internet for those kinds of jokes.
WldFyre@lemm.ee 11 months ago
So his contributions were wrong but now you’re moving goalposts and saying they’re funny and obviously wrong, so it’s okay? WTF kind of standard is that lol
Neve8028@lemm.ee 11 months ago
The Scots guy is a better example, imo. Someone who was trying to contribute in a positive manner but filled the wiki with complete gibberish.