Wikipedia should run a fund raiser: "Give us a billion dollars or we'll change the name."
Comment on Elon Musk Offers to Also Ruin Wikipedia
Veedem@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I donated to Wikipedia, today. A few bucks to a very valuable site.
Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 year ago
ZeroCool@feddit.ch 1 year ago
$1b = Wikipedia
< $1b = W
Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
Nah, he’d call it X again, like literally every other company he’s tried that with.
cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Amazing idea
Janonym@feddit.de 1 year ago
But for only $8 a month you are the only one who’s allowed to edit your site.
n3m37h@lemmy.world 1 year ago
1 Bil should be “Elon is a cunt-apedia” < 1 bil = wikipedia
UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee 1 year ago
A few years ago, I set up a monthly donation. Of all things I can use for free on the internet, Wikipedia deserves it the most.
bunnyfc@kbin.social 1 year ago
Wikipedia is not the Achilles heel of free access to information. The Achilles heel are the sources: libraries, websites.
Consider donating to the internet archive instead or as well. If the sources are poisoned, Wikipedia just repeats bullshit. It's secondary literature.
IdealShrew@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m not sure you know what Achilles heel means
Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
I believe they mean that if Wikipedia dies, we are still able to get proper information from the actual sources.
Wikipedia just summarizes the primary sources.
ram@bookwormstory.social 1 year ago
Wikipedia actually much prefers secondary and even tertiary sources to primary sources. They have rules against original research, and follows the guideline that “secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic’s notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources”. It’s only with exception that primary sources are allowed, in which the primary sources “have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them.”
Not disagreeing with you, just a bit of nuance.
emberwit@feddit.de 1 year ago
You don’t just alter facts, logical reasoning and scientific standards.
wagesj45@kbin.social 1 year ago
Technically, I think they only allow primary sources to be referenced if supported by a secondary source. They have weird and complex rules around that,
jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 year ago
Source: Wikipedia