No, the study is talking about other sources of fructose:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/…/oby.23920
Though the study doesn’t say that fructose is the root cause of obesity from what I see (search doesn’t work properly there). I’m not sure if in such a complex mechanism as a human body a single cause of obesity can exist. Additionally, our bodies differ and single mutation can change the outcome.
livus@kbin.social 1 year ago
@qyron fruit is healthy.
The fructose in fruit isn't as easily absorbed due to fibre. Also there's a natural limit to how much we can consume, no one eats 20 oranges in one sitting.
qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Unless they are looking for a serious case of the runs.
But I admit to have over indulged on this particular fruit more than once.
livus@kbin.social 1 year ago
@qyron grapefruit is my particular achilles heel!
Nevertheless we are physically limited by our stomach capacity and would be very unlikely to consume bioavailable fructose at the rates made possible by industrial fructose such as HFCS.
riskable@programming.dev 1 year ago
The runs? No. A run to the store to buy more Tums is more likely.
qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
When in doubt, both!
FleetingTit@feddit.de 1 year ago
That sounds like a challenge to me…
livus@kbin.social 1 year ago
@FleetingTit I'm still haunted by that scene in Se7en where the guy has "striations" in his stomach from being forced to overeat.
msage@programming.dev 1 year ago
So like freshly squeezed orange juice in large quantities?
livus@kbin.social 1 year ago
@msage even that isn't as hard on the liver as processed orange juice that has no fibre in it. But it's the things that have extra fructose added into them that I would be wary of.
An Australian guy did a SuperSizeMe type film where he ate the exact same number of calories he'd eaten before, and worked out just as much, but he went for food with added fructose. It's really interesting.