Comment on Google has sent internet into ‘spiral of decline’, claims DeepMind co-founder

• Rodeo@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  So the people who made those decisions just get a free pass then?

  Come on, let’s hold people accountable. The system sucks, I agree, but the issues are massively exacerbated by the rich and powerful not being held accountable. So don’t let them hide behind economic ideologies or legal entities; point your finger at them.

  source

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Not defending Google but the truth is legally, the directors at Google have to drive shareholder value and thus every legal opportunity must be explored. Not just a Google issue as many nations have similar laws that drive this sort of behaviour. Money wants to make money and the laws are structured in their favour.

    source

    • BaardFigur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Then it’s the laws that are fucked up, and need to be fixed

      source
  • angrystego@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    There are two opposing positions in this thread and I wholeheartedly agree with both of them.

    source
• SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Capitalism isn’t the problem. It’s corruption. So rather than fix the problem and hold the corrupt individuals accountable, you’d rather stop the symptom. But then the source of the problem is still there and manifests itself elsewhere. But it’s easy just putting bandaids on things, so I can see why that would be the crux of your efforts.

  source

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Corruption is the natural end result of Capitalism.

    Do you really expect that in a society were “Greed is good” Lawmakers and Law-enforcers would magically not be seeking to maximize personal upsides like everybody else and positions of power within the State that could be used for such personal upside maximization wouldn’t attract smooth talkers seeking to become filthy rich???!

    You need to be pretty naive to expect that an environment where the greatest measure of success and discriminator for receiving superior treatment is having lots of money, the people who can get power from salesmanship (which is what politicians are: selers of themselves and of ideas) and being mates with said salesman (i.e. those who get nominated to positions by the politicians) would not be driven by maximizing their personal wealth and the prestige and superior treatment that is given to the monyed.

    Given human nature, Capitalism without widespread corruption is about as realistic Communism (the whole utopia of everybody having the same, not the bullshit that the PRC and Soviet Union deem “communism”) and, funnilly enough. they both fail for exactly the same reason: Greed.

    source
  • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’d have to agree. Morals and ethics (and the lack thereof) are what drives this perversion and the same can be seen in other economic models tried in the past like communism.

    One might argue that companies are forced to do this “because of the shareholders” but in the past companies weren’t always solely focused on short-term gain with long-term term consequences (enshittification) and they made their shareholders plenty of money for longer. It seems the focus now is to burn bright and die out fast, but that path isn’t inherent to capitalism itself.

    source