You got me! Android came after maps in 2008. So that’s not a great argument for recent development. Is pixel meaningfully different than Nexus? That would put it in 2010, or 2016 if you insist pixel is a big innovation.
Chromebooks are also a 2010 project.
Google pay I don’t think is a success? Didn’t they like relaunch it recently and shit it up by tying it to phone numbers instead of your Google account? arstechnica.com/…/google-pays-disastrous-year-con… arstechnica.com/…/google-pay-hopes-to-recover-fro… . Also the original release is 2011. Quite some time ago. But technically newer than maps!
Drive is 2012. Dang, got me. But that’s still more than 10 years old, so my actual point seems to stand.
Chromecast is 2013, so maybe within this decade.
Auto is 2015 but I know nothing about it.
I guess I should’ve said “in the past 7 years” instead of exaggerating and saying since maps!
chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Google photo sucks
papertowels@lemmy.one 1 year ago
What do you prefer using?
fiddlestix@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Immich is on a par with Google Photos, imo. It’s self hosted though, so not for everyone.
papertowels@lemmy.one 1 year ago
Yeah I have an immich instance myself, and do plan on relying more on that as I max out my Google drive size.
The bigger issue I gave with that is remote backup still imposes a cost, and like you said you gotta know what you’re doing to safely expose that to the Internet.
bitflag@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I personally love it. Being able to search “Tom at the beach drinking a cocktail” and get all the relevant pictures is magic.
lustrum@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Does it? It’s a fantastic service that works really well, whether it’s worth the price or privacy is a slightly different conversation
ZiemekZ@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You don’t have to pay Google a penny. I bought a quite cheap (50-60$) used but working Pixel 1 XL specifically for unlimited lifetime full-quality Google Photos upload.