I have even seen, although incredibly rarely, IIV to mean 3. It’s the same number of characters as III so there’s no reason not really to do it.
I think it might have been done because it was more consistent with IV equalling 4.
IV is used exclusively as 4 (except for clocks as someone else already commented) since the 15th century. Ancient Romans used both writing, IIII and IV.
I have even seen, although incredibly rarely, IIV to mean 3. It’s the same number of characters as III so there’s no reason not really to do it.
I think it might have been done because it was more consistent with IV equalling 4.
MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Interesting, are there instances of other numerals having variants or was 4 a unique situation?
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well played.
MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I thought the exact thing when I typed it haha