Yeah no I’m gonna go ahead and continue to be ok with building aircrafts and working with dangerous things being regulated 💀
Yeah no I’m gonna go ahead and continue to be ok with building aircrafts and working with dangerous things being regulated 💀
MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 1 year ago
SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not hard, but it is expensive. So why not fake it and pocket the difference? It’s not like that would literally kill people
Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
OK then spell out your name 10 nm across and send me a pic of the electron microscope
MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not necessarily about difficulty. It’s mostly about risk and consequences. If a company fucks up the screws I buy to hang up pictures, I might get a dent in my floor or a bigger hole in my wall. If a company fucks up the screws keeping a plane together, it might fall out of the sky.
bbuez@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Then why is it literally my job to work on machines that sole purpose is to find parts, yes aircraft fasteners even, that are not up to specification and reject them? If your metal is porous, it is weak. If your threads don’t make proper contact, they sheer, if the nut head is off perpendicular, it cracks. I could go on.
These parts are rejected because their particular variances make them unaccountable; they will not behave as modeled. If you think it is not hard, I would love to know your method for producing oh something like 300 fasteners a minute with that degree of precision. If our machines let even one bad part through, we’re rediscussing our contract. A 5% false reject rate is considered acceptable over having any bad part go good…
It is difficult, wouldn’t you say? Its a goddamn modern miracle, screws damnit