Comment on AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers

• SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  AI is the new buzzword for media to use.

  source

  • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It’s in the corporate world too. Today my boss mentioned the AI capabilities that a certain piece of software offered. Turns out being able to search text embedded in illustrator as Live Type is bleeding edge. Who knew.

    source

    • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This? helpx.adobe.com/illustrator/using/retype.html

      That could actually be helpful for me. Didn’t know it was a new feature lol.

      source
  • thbb@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    As commonly said: the product advertises it’s new AI feature. The job posting of the person who implemented it was ‘data scientist’, and the technique used is called logistic regression.

    Well, in this context, it’s more image comparison or some other simple technique not even relying on a training dataset.

    source
• Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Better accuracy usually

  source

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Better accuracy than what? What the article describes is fairly basic image processing. The whole thing could be done with like a dozen lines of Python.

    source

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      In Image classification. Neural-network-based ML methods can have greater accuracy than alternative options in image classification

      source

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        For classification, sure. But based on the article that’s not what they were doing here. This was just comparing an image to a bunch of other images to see if it was the same.

        source

        • -> View More Comments