Better accuracy usually
Comment on AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 year agoNot entirely sure why it needs ai for that either.
Zeth0s@lemmy.world 1 year ago
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Better accuracy than what? What the article describes is fairly basic image processing. The whole thing could be done with like a dozen lines of Python.
Zeth0s@lemmy.world 1 year ago
In Image classification. Neural-network-based ML methods can have greater accuracy than alternative options in image classification
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 year ago
For classification, sure. But based on the article that’s not what they were doing here. This was just comparing an image to a bunch of other images to see if it was the same.
SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world 1 year ago
AI is the new buzzword for media to use.
GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 1 year ago
It’s in the corporate world too. Today my boss mentioned the AI capabilities that a certain piece of software offered. Turns out being able to search text embedded in illustrator as Live Type is bleeding edge. Who knew.
SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This? helpx.adobe.com/illustrator/using/retype.html
That could actually be helpful for me. Didn’t know it was a new feature lol.
thbb@lemmy.world 1 year ago
As commonly said: the product advertises it’s new AI feature. The job posting of the person who implemented it was ‘data scientist’, and the technique used is called logistic regression.
Well, in this context, it’s more image comparison or some other simple technique not even relying on a training dataset.