Comment on AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers

qooqie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• AbidanYre@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Not entirely sure why it needs ai for that either.

  source

  • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    AI is the new buzzword for media to use.

    source

    • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s in the corporate world too. Today my boss mentioned the AI capabilities that a certain piece of software offered. Turns out being able to search text embedded in illustrator as Live Type is bleeding edge. Who knew.

      source

      • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        This? helpx.adobe.com/illustrator/using/retype.html

        That could actually be helpful for me. Didn’t know it was a new feature lol.

        source
    • thbb@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As commonly said: the product advertises it’s new AI feature. The job posting of the person who implemented it was ‘data scientist’, and the technique used is called logistic regression.

      Well, in this context, it’s more image comparison or some other simple technique not even relying on a training dataset.

      source
  • Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Better accuracy usually

    source

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Better accuracy than what? What the article describes is fairly basic image processing. The whole thing could be done with like a dozen lines of Python.

      source

      • Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        In Image classification. Neural-network-based ML methods can have greater accuracy than alternative options in image classification

        source

        • -> View More Comments