What a dumb take.
Comment on Why cyclists should NOT get the same fines as motorists | Car Culture 6 - Motonormativity
TheLurker@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Want all the same rights as other vehicles on the road but don’t want to abide by any of the rules. 🙄
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
TheLurker@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This guy is literally saying bicycle riders should not be held to the same punishment that other vehicles on the road are.
The only “dumb take” here is you, except change “take” with another 4 letter word.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
He’s saying cyclists shouldn’t be punished the same as cars are for a much less severe crime, yes.
It’s a dumb take and shows a severe lack of critical thought, “cunt”.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 year ago
We don’t want the same rights. We don’t want to be allowed on highways. Cyclists take up much less space when parking, too, so parking in an incorrect spot is not such an issue.
Nath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Whenever there’s any sort of bike vs car debate, the “don’t pay road tax” argument always comes up. It’s such a strange argument. While I’m sure they exist, I don’t know any cyclists who don’t also have a car / driver’s license.
When I commute to work on the bike, there’s a car sitting in the garage that I’m paying road taxes for that is not creating more traffic/pollution. It is not taking up a parking space in the city.
I’m also lucky enough to live in a city where I have a dedicated bike lane for all but the first and last few hundred meters of my commute. So I don’t buy the ‘traffic jams’ argument either. I’m actually faster than cars in the CBD, they slow me down.
TheLurker@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Oh for fuck sake. You pay no registration and no insurance, demand equal rights to the road and give zero shits about creating traffic jams.
Then complain when you break road rules and get fined.
You’re an entitled cunt.
Marsupial@quokk.au 1 year ago
You sound like someone who drives an American “truck”.
Cyclists are freeing up the roads from extra traffic by them not adding another car onto the road. They benefit us far more than they will ever hinder us.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Wild that chart doesn’t include a motorbike of some sort honestly.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Easy enough to calculate yourself. A quick Google says that an average motorbike might be as much as 700 pounds, and if we use the same “fat man” as the bike (300 lb), that’s a total of 1000 lb. The formula for comparative damage is (W~1~/W~2~)^4^, so plug that in and we get (1000/350)^4^, or motorbikes doing 66× the damage of the bike, or 0.00396.
If a cyclist had to pay a $10 fee, as @ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de suggests, motorbikes would pay $660, while the average car driver pays a whopping $1,100,000, if you were trying to accurately account for damage done.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Firstly, you’re an Aussie, I’m an Aussie and we’re on an Aussie instance, the heck are you using pounds for? Secondly, there’s not a chance in hell the average motorbike weighs 317 kilograms! A Honda Goldwing, notoriously one of the chonkiest, plushest experiences in motorcycling, is only 390kg, and they have an 1800cc flat-six engine. I used to ride a 500cc twin and at 192kg it was heavier than a lot of 1000cc 4cyl that have more expensive, lighter materials. These days, I have a Postie Bike and that’s exactly 100kg lighter than my 500 was. It’s the equivalent of carrying a slightly overweight dude on my shoulders.
ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Same deal as fat man really, my 300cc was like 150kg
TheLurker@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They are a bunch of entitled whinging cunts who enjoy creating traffic jams in peak hour traffic.
The fact that one of their “legion” was fined just infuriates them because they want equality on the road only it suits them.