Comment on Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations

• Epzillon@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Doesnt really matter IMO. If you have known bugs and flaws you dont showcase those, or if they are present in the showcase you atleast adress them and show what is to be expected upon release. NVIDIA just flat out didnt care. As soon as motion increases the artefacting is crazy. How do you even decide that this is remotely good enough for a demo? 

  ImageImage

  source

  • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Nvidia hears people like motion blur and AI slop so they put some AI slop in their motion blur.

    source

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Ugh. “Everyone is doing BLOOM, lets also do BLOOM but at +150% more!”

      I remember that, motion blur came after and now I guess ai 😓

      source
  • Gsus4@mander.xyz ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Image

    source
  • phar@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Okay but that is not what the person said or what the poster above quoted as being the best part. I’m not commenting on the overall performance I’m just saying that demos very often are exactly what that sentence implies they shouldn’t be.

    source
• Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  And yet, they chose to demo a broken technology with obvious bugs and flaws. The demos from tech companies are supposed to make people excited, not recoil in disgust.

  This isn’t some tiny company, either. It’s fucking nVidia, who supposedly has the money to create a good demo.

  source