The improvement removing the handles is there, but negligible. Especially considering the safety implications. Didn’t China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?
The reason to eliminate door handles that Tesla and others typically give is aerodynamic efficiency. Granted there are other bigger aerodynamic problems. gestures at the rest of the fucking truck
datendefekt@feddit.org 19 hours ago
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 14 hours ago
Didn’t China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?
Yeah, but that literally just happened last month and doesn’t take effect until January 2027. It’s not like they did that years ago because they saw it coming.
echodot@feddit.uk 15 hours ago
That’s just nonsense justification they came up with after the fact. Ferraris have door handles, so clearly they’re not much of an issue.
Anyway the car isn’t going to exceed 80 miles an hour anyways so aerodynamics barely comes into it.
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
For internal door handles?
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 48 minutes ago
Optimized for flatulence.
carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
I was thinking of the external ones which aren’t default exposed
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 48 minutes ago
That was always Musk bullshit. Flush mechanical handles were a thing in the 70s.
echodot@feddit.uk 15 hours ago
I thought they did have internal door handles but they’re hidden away. The problem is often they’re difficult to get to even when the car is completely intact.
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
When it comes to driving a self-propelled crematorium, I’d primarily be concerned about the internal door handles.