Comment on Dumb glasses
lumen@feddit.nl 1 day agoI agree it can be creepy. But where I live, and in the US, as well as many other countries, you have no expectation of privacy in public. That’s why it’s called public. It might feel right to want to impose some restrictions on public photography, but since there’s absolutely no way to fairly draw a line, it’s better to not impose limits at all.
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de [bot] 1 day ago
there’s absolutely a way to draw a line. no smart glasses.
lumen@feddit.nl 1 day ago
No smart glasses. Alright, then I would wear hidden camera’s in the buttons of my shirt. The point I’m trying to make here, is that this is not a technological debate. It’s about freedoms: having your freedoms means having to respect others’ as well.
Zombie@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Like respecting others’ freedom to a reasonable degree of privacy.
lumen@feddit.nl 1 day ago
To draw a line between what is and isn’t reasonable is impossible.
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de [bot] 1 day ago
why the need for hidden recording equipment anyway? do you wanna spy on women that badly?
lumen@feddit.nl 1 day ago
You’re projecting. I only want to spy on men.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Americans are already getting brutalized and robbed for using recording equipment in public. To be fair, the intersection of protesters and glasses-camera people is very small.