Lmao. I definitely said that.
I too imagine people saying things I disagree with so I can stay upset and disagreeable
Comment on Nvidia Announces DLSS 5, and it adds... An AI slop filter over your game
nfreak@lemmy.ml 4 hours agoI too have a complete and total disregard for artstyles
Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
nfreak@lemmy.ml 3 hours ago
I mean that’s exactly what you’re saying if you genuinely thing that yassified filtered dogshit with atrocious lighting actually somehow looks better and retains the artists’ intent
PDFuego@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
You don’t think Grace would have dolled herself up to go investigate the burned out hotel where her mother was murdered as soon as she finished having a panic attack?
Psychodelic@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
I don’t recall even mentioning the “artist’s intent” ya weirdo. lol
Such an odd way of communicating and interpreting others.
AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 4 hours ago
It’s like when people look at a film deliberately animated with a particular framerate, see the version where someone had AI interpolate the frames to make it like 120 FPS, then say it looks objectively better than the original, because the only metric they can value a piece of media by at that point just seems to be “I need more frames”
Like In Into the Spider-Verse, when Miles is animated at 12 FPS, and the (more experienced) Peter Parker is animated at 24 FPS, but after Miles improves and gets a better hold of his skills, he gets animated at 24 FPS, too. The lower framerate subconsciously makes us interpret his movements as more choppy, inexperienced, and imprecise, on top of his existing animated movements, to even better sell the plot point of his inexperience.
Meanwhile, many people’s TVs have motion smoothing, which entirely destroys this effect and makes the film fundamentally less communicative as a result, even if on the surface people just say “It’s smoother so it’s better.”