Comment on Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash
p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours agoIn fact, I would argue that specifically designating code as machine written is detrimental to code review, because there will be a subconscious bias among many reviewers to only focus on reviewing the machine code.
Oh, it’s more than subconscious, as you can see in this thread.
Lutris developer makes a perfectly sane and nuianced response to a reactionary “is lutris slop now” comment, and gets shit on for it, because everybody has to fight in black and white terms.
What? Are you all going to shit on your lord and savior Linus himself for also saying he uses LLMs? Oh, what, you didn’t know?!?
aksdb@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
The response is only nuanced until the last sentence. If he swallowed that it would be an almost perfect response.
p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours ago
It’s not as much of a “fuck you” as much as “I’m tired of this same fucking response, when all I’m trying to do is get some work done, which I do for fucking free, by the way”.
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
A little personal flourish doesn’t invalidate the rest IMO. Humans get aggravated and humans are aggravating.
aksdb@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Yes, and I didn’t say that. I even argued in favor of his response thoughout this whole post (getting a shit ton of downvotes all along). But I think that doesn’t invalidate my point either: without this one sentence, his whole chain of arguments would have been pretty good and reasonable. It was just unnecessary to then add this snarky remark. It’s understandable if he’s pissed, but just because you are pissed when you say something doesn’t make what you said a clever move.
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
I get it. You can’t get by “Ai iS slOp” at top level comments anymore. I get that kind of ending because I would add it… but then I also don’t mind collecting downvotes so ymmv I guess.