More to the point: they replicate patterns of words.
Comment on Authors Are Furious After Finding Their Works on List of Books Used To Train AI
adriaan@sh.itjust.works 1 year agoThat would be a much better comparison if it was artificial intelligence, but these are just reinforcement learning models. They do not get inspired.
Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
lloram239@feddit.de 1 year ago
So do humans.
FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s a Bingo!
Shurimal@kbin.social 1 year ago
...like the naturally occuring neural networks are.
Khalic@kbin.social 1 year ago
The brain does not work the way you think… (I work in the field, bio-informatics). What you call “neural networks” come from an early misunderstanding of how the brain stores information. It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.
canihasaccount@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah, accurately simulating a single pyramidal neuron requires an eight-layer deep neural network:
www.cell.com/neuron/…/S0896-6273(21)00501-8.pdf
demonsword@lemmy.world 1 year ago
that was an interesting read, thank you
FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 year ago
Yet you confidently state that the brain doesn't work the way LLMs do?
Obviously it doesn't work exactly the same way that LLMs do, if only because of the completely different substrates. But when you get to more nebulous concepts like "creativity" and "inspiration" it's not so clear.
lloram239@feddit.de 1 year ago
The part where brain and neural net differ is in the learning via backpropagation, that seem to be done different in the brain, as there is no mechanism to go backwards through the network and jiggle the weights.
That aside, they seem to work very similar once they are trained, as the knowledge they are able to extract from data ends up being basically the same that a human would be able to extract. There is surprisingly little weirdness in AI and a surprising amount of human-like capabilities.
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 year ago
people have a definite fear of being defined as machines... not sure why we think were so special..
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 year ago
so its barely understood, but this definitely is not it. got it.
FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 1 year ago
But you, random stranger on the internet, knows better than the guy that literally works in the field. Got it.
lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 year ago
Tell you what, you get a landmark legal decision classifying LLM as people and then we’ll talk.
Until then it’s software being fed content in a way not permitted by its license i.e. the makers of that software committing copyright infringement.
Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What exactly was not permitted by the license
sab@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Using it to (create a tool to) create derivatives of the work on a massive scale.