Maybe we should have some rating system like Rated PG, or R, etc but for opensource software:
- 100% AI
- AI Assisted
- Human Coded
Comment on Fetcharr - a human-developed Huntarr replacement
aeiou@piefed.social 23 hours agoFor some reason the hubub around non-AI software reminds me of produce.
‘Guaranteed 100% locally open-sourced, free-range, GMOAI-free code!’
irmadlad@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
bufalo1973@piefed.social 22 hours ago
- 100% AI
- Human supervised
- AI Assisted
- Human Coded
It’s better is more fine grained.
pokexpert30@jlai.lu 9 hours ago
Stealing this for my projects that are 100% human supervised. I used “vibe coded” so far but I felt I still brang a lot.
trollblox_@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
except GMOs aren’t actively harmful while AI is
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
GMO’s create a societal harm, not a physiological one. Patenting a cultivar of a plant is a slippery slope, and we have already had quite a slide. In theory, if somebody works very hard to breed a new cultivar, they deserve to reap the rewards of that work and protect their creation. Okay, that makes sense. But if I have all the ingredients to breed that same cultivar, and do all the same work myself, should they be able to restrict my ability to profit? A step farther, and this is the reality we inhabit. Monsanto has created an environment where their patented corn seed is the best bet for a profitable harvest, but farmers are required to sign highly binding contracts with ridiculous stipulations. Beyond that, if a neighbor farmer dares to plant non patented seed, and the wind blows his neighbors Monsanto pollen (corn is wind pollinated) into his field and it pollinates his crop, he is now in patent violation of a company he has no business with that is now going to aggressively come after him in court. This is actually happening in the American Midwest.
aeiou@piefed.social 3 hours ago
so it is like AI - it spreads everywhere and creates a lot of legal problems