For some reason the hubub around non-AI software reminds me of produce.
‘Guaranteed 100% locally open-sourced, free-range, GMOAI-free code!’
Comment on Fetcharr - a human-developed Huntarr replacement
irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
human-developed
Love the distinction. LOL
aeiou@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
trollblox_@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
except GMOs aren’t actively harmful while AI is
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
GMO’s create a societal harm, not a physiological one. Patenting a cultivar of a plant is a slippery slope, and we have already had quite a slide. In theory, if somebody works very hard to breed a new cultivar, they deserve to reap the rewards of that work and protect their creation. Okay, that makes sense. But if I have all the ingredients to breed that same cultivar, and do all the same work myself, should they be able to restrict my ability to profit? A step farther, and this is the reality we inhabit. Monsanto has created an environment where their patented corn seed is the best bet for a profitable harvest, but farmers are required to sign highly binding contracts with ridiculous stipulations. Beyond that, if a neighbor farmer dares to plant non patented seed, and the wind blows his neighbors Monsanto pollen (corn is wind pollinated) into his field and it pollinates his crop, he is now in patent violation of a company he has no business with that is now going to aggressively come after him in court. This is actually happening in the American Midwest.
aeiou@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
neighbor farmer dares to plant non patented seed, and the wind blows his neighbors Monsanto pollen (corn is wind pollinated) into his field and it pollinates his crop, he is now in patent violation of a company he has no business with that is now going to aggressively come after him in court.
so it is like AI - it spreads everywhere and creates a lot of legal problems
irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Maybe we should have some rating system like Rated PG, or R, etc but for opensource software:
- 100% AI
- AI Assisted
- Human Coded
bufalo1973@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
- 100% AI
- Human supervised
- AI Assisted
- Human Coded
It’s better is more fine grained.
pokexpert30@jlai.lu 3 weeks ago
Stealing this for my projects that are 100% human supervised. I used “vibe coded” so far but I felt I still brang a lot.
egg82@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
it’s today’s trend! One I happen to agree with, which is nice.
I’m trying to limit LLM exposure on this one to “as little as possible, within reason”. It’s still a tool and can be used effectively in some areas.
irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
My only real conundrum with AI coding, is totally relying on AI as the dev, then releasing it for public use without really knowing what happens behind the scenes and obviously the security of said app. Now if the dev is using AI as an assistant, and the dev is knowledgeable enough to know that things are operating securely, I’m ok with it.
hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Yeah, there’s a version of using AI to help with coding that’s more along the lines of cobbling together pieces from tutorials to figure out how to do something rather than just straight up asking for code and blindly adding it. It’s obviously not going to be as good as code from someone experienced who’s managed to internalize the relevant documentaion, but it’s at least informed by a human who understands what it’s doing
reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Also people who think they can just vibe code without ever learning how to code for real. I’ll “vibe code”, but I’m also 10+ years experienced. I can quickly detect bullshit from the AI and I check pretty thoroughly.
Some dentist turned vibe coder will make absolute trash
irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
We have IDEs and all kinds of tools to help us code. AI is just another tool. Granted, it’s a tool that needs some heavy regulation, but a tool nonetheless.